ABSTRACT
Imagining being stranded in the grasslands of an unknown territory without basic survival materials and subsequently rating the relevance of words for this situation leads to exceptionally good memory for these words. This survival processing effect has received much attention, primarily because it has been argued to disclose the evolutionary foundations of human memory. So far, only fictitious scenarios were used to demonstrate this effect. To provide a fairer test of emotional response against richness-of-encoding explanations of the effect, we aimed at increasing everyday relevance and realism of the survival scenarios. For this purpose, we created two new Covid-19 scenarios, one focusing on emotional response (Covid-19-emotion) and the other on survival strategy (Covid-19-strategy). Both new scenarios were compared to the classical grassland and moving scenarios typically used to investigate the survival processing effect. In Experiment 1, we observed better memory for the grassland and Covid-19-strategy scenarios compared to the other two, but no significant difference between the former. A descriptively similar result pattern emerged in Experiment 2 for the number of ideas generated on how to use objects in the four scenarios. Theoretical implications are discussed.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Recall , Humans , Memory , SARS-CoV-2 , SurvivalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although it is known that mortality due to COVID-19 increases progressively with age, the probability of dying from this serious infection among the oldest-old population is little known, and controversial data are found in literature. METHODS: We examine the mortality by year and month of birth of Belgians who had turned 100 during the current COVID-19 pandemic and whose birth fell on the years around the end the First World War and the outbreak of the H1N1 "Spanish flu" pandemic. FINDINGS: The COVID-19 mortality of the "older" centenarians is significantly lower than that of "younger" centenarians, and this difference between the two groups reaches a maximum on August 1, 1918 as the discriminating cut-off date of birth. Having excluded the plausible impact of the end of WWI it becomes clear that this date corresponds to the time of reporting the first victims of the Spanish flu pandemic in Belgium. INTERPRETATION: In this study, the striking temporal coincidence between the outbreak of the Spanish flu epidemic and the birth of the cohorts characterized by greater fragility towards COVID-19 in 2020 strongly suggests a link between exposure to 1918 H1N1 pandemic influenza and resistance towards 2020 SARS-Cov-2. It can be speculated that the lifetime persistence of cross-reactive immune mechanisms has enabled centenarians exposed to the Spanish flu to overcome the threat of COVID-19 a century later.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Exposome , Influenza Pandemic, 1918-1919 , Influenza, Human , Pandemics , Survival , Aged, 80 and over , Belgium , Disease Outbreaks , Female , History, 20th Century , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Male , Parturition , Pregnancy , Protective Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , World War IABSTRACT
The use of convalescent plasma in the treatment of COVID-19 may lead to a milder course of infection and has been associated with improved outcomes. Determining optimal treatments in high risk populations is crucial, as is the case in those with hematological malignancies. We analyzed a cohort of 23 patients with hematological malignancies and COVID-19 who had received plasma 48-72 h after the diagnosis of infection and compared it with a historical group of 22 patients who received other therapy. Overall survival in those who received convalescent plasma was significantly higher than in the historical group (p = 0.03460). The plasma-treated group also showed a significantly milder course of infection (p = 0.03807), characterized by less severe symptoms and faster recovery (p = 0.00001). In conclusion, we have demonstrated that convalescent plasma is an effective treatment and its early administration leads to clinical improvement, increased viral clearance and longer overall survival in patients with hematological malignancies and COVID-19. To our knowledge, this is the first report to analyze the efficacy of convalescent plasma in a cohort of patients with hematological malignancies.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/mortality , Cohort Studies , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Male , Middle Aged , Plasma/immunology , Survival , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , COVID-19 SerotherapyABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate the behavioral aspects and beliefs of the population of Ceará in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. An online questionnaire was conducted on sociodemographic aspects and opinions related to the pandemic. Absolute and relative frequencies were calculated, the association between variables was performed with Chi-square, and the level of significance was 5%. The final sample had 2,259 participants, and an association was observed between females and perceiving themselves with a high risk of infection (p = 0.044) and males with non-performance of voluntary quarantine (p < 0.001). People aged 80 years and over were partially quarantined due to the flow of people at home (p < 0.001). Participants with elementary school education had a lower risk of infection than participants with a higher level of education (p < 0.001). This group includes people who did voluntary quarantine the least (p < 0.001). Participants living in the inland region of the state had less direct contact with someone tested positive for the Coronavirus (p = 0.031) and are less reclusive (p < 0.001). We can conclude that the approach to the COVID-19 pandemic varies by social aspects, such as gender, age, education, and place of residence, as well as the belief system of the population of the State of Ceará.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Betacoronavirus , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Public Health , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Isolation , Surveys and Questionnaires , SurvivalABSTRACT
Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 has currently affected 8,015,502 million people worldwide with global mortality around 5%. Information in pediatric cancer patients is still limited, but it is emerging day by day. The objective of this scoping review was to analyze the available data associated with COVID-19 infection and mortality in pediatric cancer patients and to provide useful information to plan and design strategies in this group. Methods: A search was conducted, and eight articles were obtained for qualitative analysis; 110 patients were included, all from cross-sectional studies. At the time of publication, all the analyzed documents reported no deaths associated with COVID-19. Results: According to the information, COVID-19 infection appears to be less severe in the pediatric population in comparison with adults and does not appear to be a cause of mortality in patients with childhood cancer. Conclusions: Given the nature of preliminary reports and a short follow-up in cancer patients, it is necessary to have medium- and long-term follow-up studies to determine the effects of infection and modifications to the treatments of these patients.
Introducción: La enfermedad conocida como COVID-19 ha afectado ya a 8,015,502 millones de personas en el mundo, con una mortalidad global de aproximadamente el 5%. La información en pacientes pediátricos con cáncer es aún limitada y está surgiendo día a día. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática fue conocer los datos disponibles sobre la COVID-19 y la mortalidad en los pacientes pediátricos con cáncer, y aportar información útil para planear y diseñar estrategias en este grupo. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda y se seleccionaron ocho artículos para realizar un análisis cuantitativo; se incluyeron 110 pacientes, todos provenientes de estudios transversales. Al momento de las publicaciones, no se documentaron fallecimientos asociados a la COVID-19 en los documentos analizados. Resultados: De acuerdo con la información de esta revisión sistemática, la COVID-19 parece ser menos grave que en los adultos y no parece ser causa de mortalidad en pacientes pediátricos con cáncer. Conclusiones: Dada la naturaleza de los reportes preliminares y el corto seguimiento en los pacientes con cáncer, es necesario contar con estudios de seguimiento a mediano y largo plazo para conocer los efectos de la infección y de las modificaciones del tratamiento en estos pacientes.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Neoplasms/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , COVID-19 , Child , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Severity of Illness Index , SurvivalSubject(s)
Climate Change , Commerce , Carbon , Conservation of Natural Resources , Economics , Humans , Nuclear Weapons , SurvivalABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: If the narrative of "coronavirus" has an underlying theme, it may perhaps for some be one of survival, whilst for others, the theme might be suffering. The recurring motif of survival has continued throughout history, yet for the first time the sum of all fears has amounted to a run on the bare essentials. This paper seeks to offer an alternative formulation of "panic buying," with references to literature, philosophy, and contemporary neurobiology. CONCLUSION: The bare essentials disappeared perhaps as part of some self-fulfilling prophecy: the supermarkets became bare because others inadvertently lead us to believe they would become bare. The contagion model of emotional propagation provides a psychological model of how "panic buying" by an individual might lead to the replication of panic in an observer. The Polyvagal Theory further informs us of how the threat posed by the pandemic primes our limbic system to perceive danger, and explains how witnessing others engaging in fight-flight responses might evoke a fearful affect in an observer. In the end, it is perhaps through Nietzsche's study of classical tragedy that we may find some meaning to the pandemic, allowing our collective lived experience to serve as a template for growth.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Disaster Victims/psychology , Fear , Neurobiology , Panic , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Survival/psychology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Emotional Adjustment , Humans , Pandemics , Psychological Theory , Psychology, Social , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: As of March 23, 2020, suspension of non-essential activities was declared in Mexico throughout the country in order to mitigate the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To analyze data on the first 1,510 laboratory-confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Mexico, and to describe the geographical distribution of the disease and its transmission dynamics. METHOD: Description of the first COVID-19 cases with real-time RT-PCR-positive test, as well as evaluation of epidemiological measures, cumulative incidence, rate of transmission, and mortality and lethality rates during the first month of the epidemic. RESULTS: Average age was 43 years, and 58 % were males; 44 % of initial cases were imported. Lethality in the population during the first month went from 1.08 to 3.97 per 100 cases; however, the trend is linear and similar to that observed in Europe. CONCLUSIONS: In Mexico, social distancing is being applied, but studies are still required on the dynamics of the epidemic, person-to-person transmission, incidence of subclinical infections, and patient survival.
INTRODUCCIÓN: A partir del 23 de marzo de 2020, en México se declaró la suspensión de actividades no esenciales en todo el país para mitigar la diseminación de la pandemia de COVID-19. OBJETIVO: Analizar los datos sobre los primeros 1510 casos de COVID-19 confirmados por laboratorio en México, describir la distribución geográfica de la enfermedad y su dinámica de transmisión. MÉTODO: Descripción de los primeros casos de COVID-19 con prueba positiva de RT-PCR en tiempo real, así como evaluación de las medidas epidemiológicas, incidencia acumulada, razón de contagios y tasas de mortalidad y letalidad durante el primer mes de la epidemia. RESULTADOS: La edad promedio fue de 43 años y 58 % fue del sexo masculino; 44 % de los casos iniciales fue importado. La letalidad en la población durante el primer mes pasó de 1.08 a 3.97 por 100 casos; sin embargo, la tendencia es lineal y similar a la observada en Europa. CONCLUSIONES: En México se está aplicando el distanciamiento social, pero aún se requieren estudios sobre la dinámica de la epidemia, la transmisión de persona a persona, la incidencia de infecciones subclínicas y la supervivencia de los enfermos.